Friday, 14 September 2007

a respected identity


When I detailed my Danish Great, Great Grandfather's obituary in an earlier post, I told you that he was referred to as an 'old and respected identity'. It took me a long time to trace Jens Peter Jensen's history before he arrived in Australia (and there are still gaping holes) but I do know that his Mother was probably not a respected identity.

I am fascinated by the story of Jens Peter's Mother, Jensine Christiane Jensdatter. Jens Peter listed her as 'Christiane' on his records in Australia, so perhaps that is how she was known. She had at least 5 children and, from what I can glean, all by different fathers. As I traced her story through the Danish church records, it felt as though I was witnessing some 19th Century soap opera. I know that being a single mother could not have been easy, so I was thrilled when I discovered her marriage to Jeppe Holm Jonasen in 1848, saddened when both her daughter and Jeppe's daughter from his previous marriage died in 1852, and devastated when her and Jeppe's son died two years later. Jeppe died not long after, and I have lost track of Jensine Christiane from that point on. Unlike other branches of my family where illegitimate births do not have father's names attached, the Danish records have the 'alleged' father recorded. This is a remarkable thing and marvelously useful.

An understanding of Jen Peter's family history goes some way toward explaining why he chose to come to Queensland. Of his 8 children, 6 were daughters. Here 5 of those women are pictured on the beach. The second from the right is my Great Grandmother Caroline, or Grandma Riemer, as she was known in my family.

Image reference: Jensen sisters Edna, Camilla, Helen, Carrie and Elsie, enjoying a day at the beach. Image no. 46859r. Qld Library Collection

Wednesday, 12 September 2007

the tree as it stands


I spoke to a group of students at the Queensland College of Art this last Monday. They are preparing for a project looking at bodies and a few artists were asked in to discuss their approach to the body. Ray Cook, that marvellously mischievous Brisbane photographer, was talking about the secret gay stories of famous historical bodies apparently. I was sad to have missed that. There is always something fabulous about the reinterpretation of history from another viewpoint. I took a single pine finial for my show and tell, and a range of images from my practice of the past 16 years. When I thought about my work in preparation for this talk I became aware of how important the ‘missing’ body has always been to me; the bodies that become invisible, either through repression, regulation or the simple act of forgetting.

Previously I have drawn attention to no-bodies via empty spaces, cavities and the traced impressions of past presence but with this project my father and I are giving each missing body its own firm, physical proxy. I have to wonder what the implications of that will be for my future work…

Here is an image of the partially completed work as we set it up in the studio last weekend. It really does become more and more unwieldy as it grows, just like a real family. My father has taken to carrying most of the pieces around in a neat black shoulder bag. It all seems very ‘have art, will travel’ and entirely appropriate given that this is a migration story about cultural transport. There were discussions about Queensland, and a more generally Australian habit of forgetting, on Monday. It was so stimulating to hear other people’s perspectives on the project and their own stories about ‘slipping’ cultural identities. I hope that it is understood that I am not making some special claim for a Scandinavian history of Queensland in this work. I am simply curious to know why some migrant identities are ‘marked’ and remain highly visible, while others evaporate. I will always be suspicious of forgotten data. If my ancestors were chosen as suitable migrants to Australia because it was presumed their own heritage and difference would disappear, it becomes my job to rattle that presumption, no matter how long ago it was made.